Re: Are there windows binaries for 5.20?
Michael Lackhoff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 17.02.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Steve Hay: > You can't. The VC9 build of the mod_perl components are not compatible > with StrawberryPerl, which is built with gcc and therefore uses a > different CRT (msvcrt.dll vs msvcr90.dll). > > The 32-bit components that I've built before were built with VC6 in > order to use the same CRT as StrawberryPerl/ActivePerl, but that's no > longer an option since ActiveState only make 64-bit-int versions of > their 32-bit ActivePerl available now and the 64-bit-int build option > doesn't work with VC6 due to bugs in that ancient compiler. I can make > a 32-bit-int VC6 perl myself, of course, but then the mod_perl > components still won't match ActivePerl because of the 32/64-bit-int > mismatch... That is why I've only made 64-bit versions available > recently... > > And that's why I need to change mod_perl so that it can be built with gcc/dmake. > > (I asked ActiveState to consider making 32-bit-int versions available > as well (like StrawberryPerl do), but they declined.) But then it should be possible to build a 32-bit version with VC6 for Strawberry, just not for Activestate? Or did I misunderstand your last sentence? Since I use Strawberry that would be fine with me. I think I even still have VC6 around somewhere... Or else -- given the uncertainty of predictions -- do you have an estimation when you get into the gcc/dmake thing? -Michael