Re: Patch to mod_proxy for fixed reverse mapping support

On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 12:14, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> 
> > I have no suggestion, but hasn't this already been done in 2.0?  The
> > only problem with doing this in 1.3, is that we are unlikely to have
> > anymore 1.3 releases.  We may be better off to just keep the patch on
> > the site.
> 
> AFAIK v2.0 doesn't (does it?) - I was going to commit to v2.0, and then 
> to v1.3 for completeness (even if there are no new versions of v1.3, at 
> least it's there).
> 

before you commit the change to 2.0 can you make sure that the existing
behavior is still maintained/available, and if it can't be then you will
need to make a new directive.

also.. what about virtual hosts.. doesn't requiring them to have a
hostname break them?

> Regards,
> Graham
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------
> [email protected] 
> 	"There's a moon
> 					over Bourbon Street
> 						tonight..."
-- 
Ian Holsman
Performance Measurement & Analysis
CNET Networks
PH: 415-344-2608