Re: Patch to mod_proxy for fixed reverse mapping support

Graham Leggett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-proxy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ian Holsman wrote:

> before you commit the change to 2.0 can you make sure that the existing
> behavior is still maintained/available, and if it can't be then you will
> need to make a new directive.

There is no change that I can see to existing behaviour (there was no 
previous sane behaviour for ProxyPassReverse http://blah/ http://foo/)

> also.. what about virtual hosts.. doesn't requiring them to have a
> hostname break them?

There is no requirement to have a hostname - the old behaviour still holds.

Regards,
Graham
-- 
-----------------------------------------
[email protected] 
	"There's a moon
					over Bourbon Street
						tonight..."
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.