Re: setting INTERACTIVITY back to "not set"?

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:59:42 -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> Can you try the attached patch?

Well, that was a little more work than I had hoped :).  Thanks!  I'll
give it a try.


> diff --git a/common-src/conffile.c b/common-src/conffile.c
[...]
> @@ -4829,6 +4877,8 @@ read_dpolicy(
>  {
>      policy_s *policy;
>  
> +    amfree(val->v.s);
> +    amfree(val->v.s);

(This double "amfree" line just happened to catch my eye as I skimmed
the patch...  I assume the second one is just an editing error?)


								Nathan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Stratton Treadway  -  [email protected]  -  Mid-Atlantic region
Ray Ontko & Co.  -  Software consulting services  -   http://www.ontko.com/
 GPG Key: http://www.ontko.com/~nathanst/gpg_key.txt   ID: 1023D/ECFB6239
 Key fingerprint = 6AD8 485E 20B9 5C71 231C  0C32 15F3 ADCD ECFB 6239