Re: setting INTERACTIVITY back to "not set"?

On 14/11/17 02:37 PM, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:59:42 -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> > Can you try the attached patch?
>
> Well, that was a little more work than I had hoped :). Thanks! I'll
> give it a try.
>
>
> > diff --git a/common-src/conffile.c b/common-src/conffile.c
> [...]
> > @@ -4829,6 +4877,8 @@ read_dpolicy(
> > {
> > policy_s *policy;
> >
> > + amfree(val->v.s);
> > + amfree(val->v.s);
>
> (This double "amfree" line just happened to catch my eye as I skimmed
> the patch... I assume the second one is just an editing error?)
>
Yes, you can remove one of them

Jean-Louis
This message is the property of CARBONITE, INC. and may contain confidential or privileged information.
If this message has been delivered to you by mistake, then do not copy or deliver this message to anyone.  Instead, destroy it and notify me by reply e-mail