Re: Debian Buster, bsdtcp, systemd --- 10 GBit-NIC

"Stefan G. Weichinger" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.archivers.amanda.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 22.07.21 um 13:54 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:

> I defined this in amanda.conf
> 
> define interface chelsio {
> 
>      comment "10G NIC"
> 
>      use 10 Gbps
> 
> }

More tuning ahead, not yet verified (= waiting for the next amdump):


inparallel 6
dumporder "BTBTBT"
netusage  10 Gbps
device-output-buffer-size 2048k # LTO6 drive

In

"define application-tool app_amgtar"

property "TAR-BLOCKSIZE" "1024"

Quick tests show that this improves the creation of the "tar-stream" on 
the client.

Restore test: todo. Sure.

-

What I can't yet explain:

the holdingdisk (Samsung SSD 860 EVO 2TB)

* it is attached to a MegaRAID SAS 2008 controller. The local admin 
created a RAID0 device on the controller, this gives us /dev/sdb in linux

* one partition /dev/sdb1, XFS

UUID=781a9caf-39f2-4e5a-b7cd-f2b320e06b74 /mnt/amhold   xfs noatime 0 0

* # cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler

[none] mq-deadline

I can write to it via dd with over 200 MB/s:

root@backup:/mnt/amhold# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/amhold/testfile bs=1G 
count=1 oflag=direct

1+0 Datensätze ein

1+0 Datensätze aus

1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 4,52339 s, 237 MB/s

OK; slower with smaller blocks:

root@backup:/mnt/amhold# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/amhold/testfile bs=4M 
count=1000 oflag=direct

1000+0 Datensätze ein

1000+0 Datensätze aus

4194304000 bytes (4,2 GB, 3,9 GiB) copied, 23,2486 s, 180 MB/s

-

When I amdump a single DLE from another client, no compression, and 
watch with "atop", I see /dev/sdb1 at 100% "load" ... with around 130 
MB/s max, decreasing write rate over time.

The clients storage is able to deliver with around 300MB/s.

And the NICs are 10G each.

Where is the bottleneck? Or do I expect too much?

The CPU cores are NOT fully loaded ...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.