Re: Debian Buster, bsdtcp, systemd --- 10 GBit-NIC

Jose M Calhariz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.archivers.amanda.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:45:49AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 22.07.21 um 13:54 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> 
> > I defined this in amanda.conf
> > 
> > define interface chelsio {
> > 
> >      comment "10G NIC"
> > 
> >      use 10 Gbps
> > 
> > }
> 
> More tuning ahead, not yet verified (= waiting for the next amdump):
> 
> 
> inparallel 6
> dumporder "BTBTBT"
> netusage  10 Gbps
> device-output-buffer-size 2048k # LTO6 drive

How many clients do you have?



> 
> In
> 
> "define application-tool app_amgtar"
> 
> property "TAR-BLOCKSIZE" "1024"
> 
> Quick tests show that this improves the creation of the "tar-stream" on the
> client.
> 
> Restore test: todo. Sure.
> 
> -
> 
> What I can't yet explain:
> 
> the holdingdisk (Samsung SSD 860 EVO 2TB)
> 
> * it is attached to a MegaRAID SAS 2008 controller. The local admin created
> a RAID0 device on the controller, this gives us /dev/sdb in linux
> 
> * one partition /dev/sdb1, XFS
> 
> UUID=781a9caf-39f2-4e5a-b7cd-f2b320e06b74 /mnt/amhold   xfs noatime 0 0
> 
> * # cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler
> 
> [none] mq-deadline
> 
> I can write to it via dd with over 200 MB/s:
> 
> root@backup:/mnt/amhold# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/amhold/testfile bs=1G
> count=1 oflag=direct
> 
> 1+0 Datensätze ein
> 
> 1+0 Datensätze aus
> 
> 1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 4,52339 s, 237 MB/s
> 
> OK; slower with smaller blocks:
> 
> root@backup:/mnt/amhold# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/amhold/testfile bs=4M
> count=1000 oflag=direct
> 
> 1000+0 Datensätze ein
> 
> 1000+0 Datensätze aus
> 
> 4194304000 bytes (4,2 GB, 3,9 GiB) copied, 23,2486 s, 180 MB/s

I was expecting much more from the SSD, but I can be thinking in
faster NVME.

Just for curiosity, what "hdparm -tT /dev/sdb" gives.

> 
> -
> 
> When I amdump a single DLE from another client, no compression, and watch
> with "atop", I see /dev/sdb1 at 100% "load" ... with around 130 MB/s max,
> decreasing write rate over time.
> 
> The clients storage is able to deliver with around 300MB/s.
> 
> And the NICs are 10G each.
> 
> Where is the bottleneck? Or do I expect too much?
> 
> The CPU cores are NOT fully loaded ...
> 

On my setup I have more than 190 clients using auth=ssh with a NIC
of 10Gb/s.

On my amanda.conf for example:

inparallel 62
dumporder "TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTtt"

Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz


-- 
--
	Não preciso de advogados para me dizer o que não devo fazer.
	Eu os contrato para me dizer como fazer o que quero fazer.
		-- J. Pierpont Morgan
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=312u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.