Re: zita-a2j and capture alignment

Fons Adriaensen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ardour.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:32:51AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

> Ardour cannot correct the case where the source (the JACK backend or zita)
> are not in agreement. Sorry, this is asking for the absurd. The regions are
> not a different length - they contain different data. Pop up the region
> properties editor (right click on a region > properties) to establish this.
> Their data is different because there is a skew between the two sources.
> Nothing ardour can do (or know) will improve this.

So how (if at all) does ardour use the capture latency values when recording ?

Suppose you have two identical sound cards. One is used by Jack's backend,
the other by zita-a2j. Both set the correct capture latency value on their
ports. For a2j this will of course be a higher value than for the backend.

Connect the same signal to the two cards, record two tracks simultaneously,
one from each card. 

I'd expect the two resulting regions

* to be in sync when played back,
* to have different start/end points.

assuming ardour uses the capture latency values to offset the regions.

If not, how are the latency values used ?

Ciao,

-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.