Re: should solo-in-place and/or exclusive solo be session specific?

Paul Davis <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:55:29 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ardour.devel
Message-ID <CAFa_cKkzXVOfwjXfECy-Ph9iVwgp1p23R+zvN6hc9bRX1UQ=KQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Fons Adriaensen <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:31:56AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > A nice idea, but some people would want to reverse the bindings
> (especially
> > macos users), which then creates an isomorphic option ("what does left
> > click on a solo button do?")
>
> Alternatives to [LR]-click would be using Shift,Ctl,Alt,...
> This could be configurable, like (almost) everything else is.
> Any such configuration is clearly a *user* preference, so it
> should not be part of the session state.
>

This thread is based on someone who would like Ardour changed so that it
*is* a part of the session state (because they prefer using different modes
depending on the state of the session). Right now, it is a global (i.e.
user) preference.


>
> Another approach again would be to make the exclusive-or-not
> selection more easily accessible. It sort of annoying that
> you need to go through several levels of menus/tabs to change
> it.
>

If you use the monitor section, there's a button for it directly visible.

_______________________________________________
ardour-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-dev-ardour.org