Re: should solo-in-place and/or exclusive solo be session specific?
Paul Davis <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:55:29 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.ardour.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFa_cKkzXVOfwjXfECy-Ph9iVwgp1p23R+zvN6hc9bRX1UQ=KQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Fons Adriaensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:31:56AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > > A nice idea, but some people would want to reverse the bindings > (especially > > macos users), which then creates an isomorphic option ("what does left > > click on a solo button do?") > > Alternatives to [LR]-click would be using Shift,Ctl,Alt,... > This could be configurable, like (almost) everything else is. > Any such configuration is clearly a *user* preference, so it > should not be part of the session state. > This thread is based on someone who would like Ardour changed so that it *is* a part of the session state (because they prefer using different modes depending on the state of the session). Right now, it is a global (i.e. user) preference. > > Another approach again would be to make the exclusive-or-not > selection more easily accessible. It sort of annoying that > you need to go through several levels of menus/tabs to change > it. > If you use the monitor section, there's a button for it directly visible. _______________________________________________ ardour-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-dev-ardour.org