Re: Spectral Editing is Not User Friendly
Steve the Fiddle <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:19:32 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.audacity.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABp83eDYigcreAxz9g-q==3_F_0VLdpdZwUAaivicigiO8P8Mw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Nikita, Spectral Editing in Audacity is a fairly new, and not yet fully developed, feature. Despite its shortcomings, it was considered to still be useful enough to include in the Audacity release. I like the idea of being able to export the spectrogram, edit in an image editor, and then import back into Audacity. I presume that what you have in mind is similar to the software "Photosounder" (http://photosounder.com/). That would be a totally new feature, with only superficial similarity to the current "spectral edit" feature. The current feature is really a 'simulation' of editing the spectrogram, rather than actually editing it. How it works is that the selected spectral region sets two frequency parameters (high and low). Specially crafted effects (the "Spectral" effects) can then use these parameters to control their behaviour. The effects then process the audio data as would any other audio effect. So the effect is not actually acting on the spectrogram - it acts on the audio, and the spectrogram is updated from the processed audio. Steve On 6 October 2017 at 13:38, Nikita Sadkov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! It was an amazing discovery, that Audacity now supports spectral > editing - arguably one of the most fundamental features, especially if > you want to synth custom sfx for your project or edit some badly > recorded material from https://freesound.org > > My complain is that it is very obscure and tedious to use in its > current form. You have to separately enable spectral selection and use > "Spectral edit ..." tools under "Effect" menu. I.e. you can't just > press Del to clear the frequencies or use Draw Tool (F3) to paint your > sfx with mouse. > > So I think it would make Audacity order of magnitude more useful, if > it copies UI from Sony SpectraLayers, together with layers, which > works just like a raster editor, but unfortunately lacks waveform > editing capabilities. Also, it would be nice feature to export > spectrum plot into png files, so people could edit it in GIMP and then > import back into Audacity. > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > *********** ASKING FOR HELP ************* > > When asking for help on this list, please include the following > information, so we can > help you properly: > > * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X > 10.5.1) > > * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help > > About > Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer) > > * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with, > and how is it > connected to the computer? > > Mailing list: [email protected] > To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot *********** ASKING FOR HELP ************* When asking for help on this list, please include the following information, so we can help you properly: * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X 10.5.1) * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help > About Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer) * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with, and how is it connected to the computer? Mailing list: [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users