Re: Spectral Editing is Not User Friendly
Nikita Sadkov <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Oct 2017 19:37:17 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.audacity.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABurZuLXekO4cZj_h+MqW+yQKPKb5OtATKVfunOoWRZeyrNDQQ@mail.gmail.com> |
>The current feature is really a 'simulation' of editing the spectrogram, rather than actually editing it. ... the effect is not actually acting on the spectrogram - it acts on the audio, and the spectrogram is updated from the processed audio. That is an implementation detail, from which user should be saved (although I guess SpectraLayers work the same way, because directly editing spectrum would be too hard to implement properly). So implementing GIMP-style brush, acting on spectrum, would make spectrum editing intuitive. Such brush would auto select the region and bands (according to its size), then pass it to a filter (according to brush intensity). Although usual rectangle/lasso/magic-wand selection is nice too, because you select say white-noise/hum/buzz band and just delete it. Also, switching to spectrum editing can be a toolbar button or a hotkey, so users could discover and access the feature easily. Anyway, spectrum editing is one of the most useful features of audio editors: it improve good recording or fix otherwise failed recording (i.e. somebody coughed or got phone call during a recording). On 10/6/17, Steve the Fiddle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nikita, > > Spectral Editing in Audacity is a fairly new, and not yet fully developed, > feature. Despite its shortcomings, it was considered to still be useful > enough to include in the Audacity release. > > I like the idea of being able to export the spectrogram, edit in an image > editor, and then import back into Audacity. I presume that what you have in > mind is similar to the software "Photosounder" (http://photosounder.com/). > That would be a totally new feature, with only superficial similarity to > the current "spectral edit" feature. > > The current feature is really a 'simulation' of editing the spectrogram, > rather than actually editing it. How it works is that the selected spectral > region sets two frequency parameters (high and low). Specially crafted > effects (the "Spectral" effects) can then use these parameters to control > their behaviour. The effects then process the audio data as would any other > audio effect. So the effect is not actually acting on the spectrogram - it > acts on the audio, and the spectrogram is updated from the processed audio. > > Steve > > On 6 October 2017 at 13:38, Nikita Sadkov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi! It was an amazing discovery, that Audacity now supports spectral >> editing - arguably one of the most fundamental features, especially if >> you want to synth custom sfx for your project or edit some badly >> recorded material from https://freesound.org >> >> My complain is that it is very obscure and tedious to use in its >> current form. You have to separately enable spectral selection and use >> "Spectral edit ..." tools under "Effect" menu. I.e. you can't just >> press Del to clear the frequencies or use Draw Tool (F3) to paint your >> sfx with mouse. >> >> So I think it would make Audacity order of magnitude more useful, if >> it copies UI from Sony SpectraLayers, together with layers, which >> works just like a raster editor, but unfortunately lacks waveform >> editing capabilities. Also, it would be nice feature to export >> spectrum plot into png files, so people could edit it in GIMP and then >> import back into Audacity. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> *********** ASKING FOR HELP ************* >> >> When asking for help on this list, please include the following >> information, so we can >> help you properly: >> >> * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS >> X >> 10.5.1) >> >> * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help >> > About >> Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer) >> >> * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with, >> and how is it >> connected to the computer? >> >> Mailing list: [email protected] >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot *********** ASKING FOR HELP ************* When asking for help on this list, please include the following information, so we can help you properly: * What operating system you are using (for example, Windows XP or Mac OS X 10.5.1) * Exactly what three digit version number of Audacity you are using (Help > About Audacity, or Audacity > About Audacity on a Mac computer) * If this is a recording problem, what equipment you are recording with, and how is it connected to the computer? Mailing list: [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the form at the bottom of this web page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-users