Re: [Csnd-dev] C++ wrapper

Rory Walsh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.csound.devel
Message-ID <CAMJR=HO-RbUgj8DiPT=ZL00aiEZy3-DdkBL-fryWezz1smZ2QA@mail.gmail.com>
I'm not against the idea, but I do like the fact that all the C++ stuff is
in one dedicated header file. I think it makes things cleaner, and also
makes it a little easier to navigate when browsing for functions. I can
also see how consolidating them might make things simpler in terms of
maintenance. Therefore I'm happy to go with the flow on this.

On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 15:53, Tarmo Johannes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I can't think of any objections, sounds like good plan to me.
>
> Tarmo
>
> L, 27. juuli 2024 16:01 Victor Lazzarini <
> [email protected]> kirjutas:
>
>> While syncing the C++ wrapper, it occurred to me that it could be more
>> convenient to place it in the same header as the C API under C++ guards,
>>
>> - it would be simpler to keep it in line with C API
>> - hosts only include csound.h in C or in C++
>>
>> Should we move to that arrangement?
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.