Re: [Csnd-dev] C++ wrapper

Michael Gogins <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.csound.devel
Message-ID <CAFswGP3c0SQbgF3=5Mr-bJpaS8enqAdZEt-GJ54oU=4cZsLEQA@mail.gmail.com>
I do not care either way.

However, I do care that the C++ threading code should be in the same header
file as all the other C++ declarations.

-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Gogins
Irreducible Productions
http://michaelgogins.tumblr.com
Michael dot Gogins at gmail dot com


On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 10:04 AM Rory Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not against the idea, but I do like the fact that all the C++ stuff is
> in one dedicated header file. I think it makes things cleaner, and also
> makes it a little easier to navigate when browsing for functions. I can
> also see how consolidating them might make things simpler in terms of
> maintenance. Therefore I'm happy to go with the flow on this.
>
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 15:53, Tarmo Johannes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I can't think of any objections, sounds like good plan to me.
>>
>> Tarmo
>>
>> L, 27. juuli 2024 16:01 Victor Lazzarini <
>> [email protected]> kirjutas:
>>
>>> While syncing the C++ wrapper, it occurred to me that it could be more
>>> convenient to place it in the same header as the C API under C++ guards,
>>>
>>> - it would be simpler to keep it in line with C API
>>> - hosts only include csound.h in C or in C++
>>>
>>> Should we move to that arrangement?
>>
>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.