Re: Loops and latency

Kai Vehmanen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.ecasound.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, S. Massy wrote:

>> ! each hop from a loop output to its input, causes an
>> ! additional delay of one engine iteration (equivalent to
> To its own input, yes, but what about to another object's input?

Joel is right, there's always the delay from loop output to its input.
This follows from the fixed routing logic: 1) read inputs, 2) process 
chains, 3) write to outputs. So when we've reached (3) and wrote to a loop 
object, it'll have to wait until next engine iteration to read it in phase 
(1) again.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Ecasound-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.