Re: Ecasound wishlist: half are solved by Nama

Hi Joel,

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Joel Roth wrote:

> Looking through Ecasound bug list[1] out of curiosity,
> I see that using Nama[2] solves about half of the open
> requests. FWIW, I'm listing and commenting them below.

thanks for sharing, this is an interesting list! And for a brief trip down 
the memory lane, this is very much in the spirit with what I wrote to the 
list roughly ten years ago:

http://eca.cx/ecasound-list/2003/08/0072.html

Well, build times are not a very good excuse anymore (from half an hour to 
less than a minute), but points (a) and (c) were (and are) still valid.

It's hard to predict how much developer time there will be in future for 
core ecasound development, but it's pretty clear the focus should really 
be on the core engine and things that must be done at native level 
(integration to JACK, LV2, et al -- keeping up with changes in 
dependencies). Your review of the wish list items is a good reminder of 
this...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ecasound-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list