Re: best sonic quality mixes
Jeremy Martin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.emagic.logic.off-topic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<redirected from the LUG to Logic-OT> From: "HKC" <hkc-/ZdNiCDpviZknbxzx/[email protected]> Date: Thu Feb 2, 2006 8:34am Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: best sonic quality mixes some of the best selling albums of all time sound like crap. Who decides what sounds like crap. You can measure headroom, floating points etc but you can't really say which sounds better than the other, it will always be your personal opinion. I recently saw an interview with John Cale who has I think had a point when he said that nothing gets better only different. These days when you talk about sound quality you mostly refer to how loud the record sounds. In music terms that means to what extent you have been able to take out all dynamics and stay at an infinate peak. Has anybody wondered why the Beatles are still one of the best selling bands in the world, now to the 3rd generation after their split-up. I looked it up and they we're bestselling in 97, 98, 00 and 01. I seriously doubt that they would have done better if they had been recorded in 32/192. ________________________________________________________________________ Logic OT - new web forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L-OT - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-OT/search - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email [email protected] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-ot/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/