AW: Re:Sound Quality

Mark Ziebarth <mark-ySCW03Y95MmS/[email protected]> Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:43:02 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.emagic.logic.tdm
Message-ID <C5943716.502C3%[email protected]>
Hi Jan and Bryan,
as this list and the slightly decreasing number of posts shows, the days of
the winning connection of Logic and TDM in ³Logic TDM² seem to be long gone.
Four years ago I had to decide which way to go: Logic or Pro Tools TDM.
First I decided to go the Logic way but after a year I missed TDM a lot,
especially the latency problem of a native rig was painful for me. Then I
decided to use both: a native Logic rig for MIDI programming and a Pro Tools
HD system for audio recording, audio editing and mixing. That works really
good for me. I also use some of the Pro Tools software instruments from the
AIR group but record all MIDI in Logic because I am so much faster in that
application. I also own a Windows machine which hosts some software
instruments but the MIDI is recorded in Logic. In the final stage of a music
project I record all software instruments into Pro Tools.
It¹s funny that all applications try to be the all-in-one-solution. I¹m
experiencing the best results with my setup by using some programs and a few
computers to do my work. I don¹t want to go back to a
one-computer/application-solution for all of my work.
I don¹t have an answer for the sound-quality question as I never tried to do
the same project in two applications. There is no obvious difference for me.
I think it¹s primarly a question of personal workarounds and how good the
application supports you in doing your job.
My three-computer-system has much more power than a single one could offer
me and I am untroubled by computer crashes. That¹s a very important thing to
me.

Kind regards

Mark

Am 14.01.2009 20:08 Uhr schrieb "Jan Stevens" unter
<janstevensmusic-/[email protected]>:

>  
>  
> 
> So the latency thing is not a problem when tracking live? How does it
> compare to TDM? I'm confident that the sound quality is great using
> Native but the latency issue is what concerns me.  What is your
> experience?
> 
> Thank You,
> 
> Jan
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:27 AM, Richard G. Mitchell wrote:
> 
>> > Hi Bryan
>> >
>> > Sadly - I am no longer a TDM user and have jumped ship to Logic 8 on
>> > an 8 Core Big Mac with 10 gig of RAM in the summer (not without long
>> > nights of worry and stress about the move!).
>> >
>> > I haven't had any contribution here for some time but still receive
>> > the group mail just to see how things are going.
>> >
>> > For many years I was a huge fan of this beastly combo. This group
>> > often had 30 or 40 entries daily! There was always a discussion
>> > somewhere about the 2 differences in sound quality ........ my
>> > memory suggests this was never resolved and that we a had arguments
>> > for both camps. Perhaps there was no difference?
>> >
>> > However ...... I've just finished my first 5.1 score on the new
>> > system (Logic "naked") ..... recording real orchestra & choral
>> > elements in other studios then extra soloist musicians here at my
>> > place + the usual VSL/Kontakt 3 /ESX24 type sampler plugins etc.
>> >
>> > Nothing that I worked on in 5.1 during my entire time with Logic/TDM
>> > comes close to the precision of sound quality in the new Logic 8
>> > simply working on board the Mac. I do realise that 5.1 is slightly
>> > more demanding in terms of phase as you have 6 channels not 2 but I
>> > should have though this was a good indication. I work on movies using
>> > huge jigsaw puzzles of audio and midi entailing many many cut an
>> > paste 5.1 stems ......... my largest track count importing 5.1 mixes
>> > back in and re-mixing this time would probably be around 30. (that's
>> > 180 channels of audio)
>> >
>> > Yet I have many famous friends all hanging onto their Protools rigs.
>> > Some even as we speak advertise boldly that they run everything on
>> > Logic and yet I know they still get their engineers to export
>> > everything as audio to Protools to mix.(but somewhat unfairly Apple
>> > do have their endorsement) When you talk to the engineers that are
>> > given the inane task of carrying out these operations ...... they
>> > tell you that there is NO reason technically ....... simply that the
>> > mega stars are worried that they might be seen to be acting un-
>> > professionally ....... "this Logic 8 and a big mac thing is for semi
>> > - pros" ........ BOLLOCKS ......... it's stable - it rocks.
>> >
>> > THE FEAR is that kids in bedrooms all over the world had our fully
>> > professional wonderful platform delivered in their Chritsmas stocking.
>> >
>> > That isn't to say it doesn't work though. If you need to run both
>> > large midi and audio sessions, it works ........ the latency thing is
>> > very copable with ......... not what most expect.
>> >
>> > Anyone with £2000 (uk pounds) should seriously consider the
>> > possibility of running Logic Naked. (...... or at least go somewhere
>> > and have a test run) It's been a huge catharsis for me ....... my
>> > eureka moment ......... freedom at last.
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Dick
>> >
>> >
>> > 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
>  
>     


-- 
Mark Ziebarth
Mühlenkamp 12 d
22303 Hamburg
Telefon:
++494027800926 (Studio)
++491733135456 (mobil)
++494065055216 (Fax)



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

________________________________________________________________________
Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM
- To UNSUBSCRIBE: email [email protected]
- Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/searchYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-tdm/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-tdm/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/