AW: Re:Sound Quality
Mark Ziebarth <mark-ySCW03Y95MmS/[email protected]> Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:43:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.emagic.logic.tdm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C5943716.502C3%[email protected]> |
Hi Jan and Bryan, as this list and the slightly decreasing number of posts shows, the days of the winning connection of Logic and TDM in ³Logic TDM² seem to be long gone. Four years ago I had to decide which way to go: Logic or Pro Tools TDM. First I decided to go the Logic way but after a year I missed TDM a lot, especially the latency problem of a native rig was painful for me. Then I decided to use both: a native Logic rig for MIDI programming and a Pro Tools HD system for audio recording, audio editing and mixing. That works really good for me. I also use some of the Pro Tools software instruments from the AIR group but record all MIDI in Logic because I am so much faster in that application. I also own a Windows machine which hosts some software instruments but the MIDI is recorded in Logic. In the final stage of a music project I record all software instruments into Pro Tools. It¹s funny that all applications try to be the all-in-one-solution. I¹m experiencing the best results with my setup by using some programs and a few computers to do my work. I don¹t want to go back to a one-computer/application-solution for all of my work. I don¹t have an answer for the sound-quality question as I never tried to do the same project in two applications. There is no obvious difference for me. I think it¹s primarly a question of personal workarounds and how good the application supports you in doing your job. My three-computer-system has much more power than a single one could offer me and I am untroubled by computer crashes. That¹s a very important thing to me. Kind regards Mark Am 14.01.2009 20:08 Uhr schrieb "Jan Stevens" unter <janstevensmusic-/[email protected]>: > > > > So the latency thing is not a problem when tracking live? How does it > compare to TDM? I'm confident that the sound quality is great using > Native but the latency issue is what concerns me. What is your > experience? > > Thank You, > > Jan > On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:27 AM, Richard G. Mitchell wrote: > >> > Hi Bryan >> > >> > Sadly - I am no longer a TDM user and have jumped ship to Logic 8 on >> > an 8 Core Big Mac with 10 gig of RAM in the summer (not without long >> > nights of worry and stress about the move!). >> > >> > I haven't had any contribution here for some time but still receive >> > the group mail just to see how things are going. >> > >> > For many years I was a huge fan of this beastly combo. This group >> > often had 30 or 40 entries daily! There was always a discussion >> > somewhere about the 2 differences in sound quality ........ my >> > memory suggests this was never resolved and that we a had arguments >> > for both camps. Perhaps there was no difference? >> > >> > However ...... I've just finished my first 5.1 score on the new >> > system (Logic "naked") ..... recording real orchestra & choral >> > elements in other studios then extra soloist musicians here at my >> > place + the usual VSL/Kontakt 3 /ESX24 type sampler plugins etc. >> > >> > Nothing that I worked on in 5.1 during my entire time with Logic/TDM >> > comes close to the precision of sound quality in the new Logic 8 >> > simply working on board the Mac. I do realise that 5.1 is slightly >> > more demanding in terms of phase as you have 6 channels not 2 but I >> > should have though this was a good indication. I work on movies using >> > huge jigsaw puzzles of audio and midi entailing many many cut an >> > paste 5.1 stems ......... my largest track count importing 5.1 mixes >> > back in and re-mixing this time would probably be around 30. (that's >> > 180 channels of audio) >> > >> > Yet I have many famous friends all hanging onto their Protools rigs. >> > Some even as we speak advertise boldly that they run everything on >> > Logic and yet I know they still get their engineers to export >> > everything as audio to Protools to mix.(but somewhat unfairly Apple >> > do have their endorsement) When you talk to the engineers that are >> > given the inane task of carrying out these operations ...... they >> > tell you that there is NO reason technically ....... simply that the >> > mega stars are worried that they might be seen to be acting un- >> > professionally ....... "this Logic 8 and a big mac thing is for semi >> > - pros" ........ BOLLOCKS ......... it's stable - it rocks. >> > >> > THE FEAR is that kids in bedrooms all over the world had our fully >> > professional wonderful platform delivered in their Chritsmas stocking. >> > >> > That isn't to say it doesn't work though. If you need to run both >> > large midi and audio sessions, it works ........ the latency thing is >> > very copable with ......... not what most expect. >> > >> > Anyone with £2000 (uk pounds) should seriously consider the >> > possibility of running Logic Naked. (...... or at least go somewhere >> > and have a test run) It's been a huge catharsis for me ....... my >> > eureka moment ......... freedom at last. >> > >> > Best >> > Dick >> > >> > >> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- Mark Ziebarth Mühlenkamp 12 d 22303 Hamburg Telefon: ++494027800926 (Studio) ++491733135456 (mobil) ++494065055216 (Fax) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________ Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email [email protected] - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/searchYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-tdm/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-tdm/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/