Re: RMS meters

I don't remember how the code works to be honest :)

It could be a pref, but it should be possible to pick a sensible  
value and divide it by the sample rate, or whatever.

- Steve

On 10 May 2007, at 02:36, Jan Depner wrote:

> On the subject of the time setting for rms_new - shouldn't that be  
> based
> on a number of samples instead of a fixed time?  Right now I'm testing
> it with 1000 samples and it looks pretty good (0.022 seconds).  The  
> way
> I set it is in process_init I divide 1000 by the sample rate and use
> that as the time value in the rms_new calls.  If we just set a time
> value like 0.05 we'll be computing the RMS on 2205 samples when we're
> running at 44100Hz and 4800 samples when we're running at 96000Hz.  Or
> am I just confused ;-)  Also, if this is the correct way to do this,
> should I make the value a preference?
>
> Jan
>
>
> -- 
> Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner
> http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69
>
> "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of
> arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but  
> rather to
> skid in sideways, chardonnay in one hand, chocolate in the other, body
> thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO, what  
> a ride'"
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Jamin-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jamin-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/