Re: Feature Request JAMin

On 02/05/2013 04:58 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
> On Wed, February 6, 2013 8:35 am, David Nielson wrote:
>> On 02/05/2013 02:32 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>> I'm thinking of the best way to handle that in the UI. We could add a
>>> "tabbed" view to each compressor to display the delay control, limiter
>>> and
>>> volume for each band by making the "delay" label clickable. Other
>>> suggestions welcome.
>>
>> Sounds ideal to me. Though if you put them in tabs, you could make all
>> the controls available all the time, so long as the right tab is selected.
>>
>>   > I suppose it is just a case of adding additional sliders for each
>>   > band and giving them their own compressor+delay+limiter+volume
>>   > control? Do we need to have some kind of sane limit to the number of
>>   > bands in the xover?
>>
>> Yes, I believe you're right.
>>
>> We've got two people suggesting 8... *I* can't imagine needing more than
>> 8 bands, but I hate to be Bill Gates saying 640k ought to be enough for
>> anybody ;-)
>>
>
> Just to confirm, by 8 band we are talking about 4 x stereo so we would
> have 4 compressors instead of three.

Hmm, I'm not sure what the other fellow meant, but I meant 8 compressors 
for a grand total of 16 outputs under stereo operation.

> Would we need more xover bands if we gave the option to increase the
> number of EQ bands from 1024 upto 16384? Looking at the code it should be
> fine to do that as long as the total is a power of 2 and more than 32.

16384-band EQ... can you imagine the things you could do...

David

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb