Re: Feature Request JAMin

Michiel Broek <[email protected]> Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:12:06 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.jamin.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 02/06/2013 05:42 AM, David Nielson wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 04:58 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>> On Wed, February 6, 2013 8:35 am, David Nielson wrote:
>>> On 02/05/2013 02:32 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>>> I'm thinking of the best way to handle that in the UI. We could add a
>>>> "tabbed" view to each compressor to display the delay control, limiter
>>>> and
>>>> volume for each band by making the "delay" label clickable. Other
>>>> suggestions welcome.
>>> Sounds ideal to me. Though if you put them in tabs, you could make all
>>> the controls available all the time, so long as the right tab is selected.
>>>
>>>    > I suppose it is just a case of adding additional sliders for each
>>>    > band and giving them their own compressor+delay+limiter+volume
>>>    > control? Do we need to have some kind of sane limit to the number of
>>>    > bands in the xover?
>>>
>>> Yes, I believe you're right.
>>>
>>> We've got two people suggesting 8... *I* can't imagine needing more than
>>> 8 bands, but I hate to be Bill Gates saying 640k ought to be enough for
>>> anybody ;-)
>>>
>> Just to confirm, by 8 band we are talking about 4 x stereo so we would
>> have 4 compressors instead of three.
> Hmm, I'm not sure what the other fellow meant, but I meant 8 compressors
> for a grand total of 16 outputs under stereo operation.
>
>> Would we need more xover bands if we gave the option to increase the
>> number of EQ bands from 1024 upto 16384? Looking at the code it should be
>> fine to do that as long as the total is a power of 2 and more than 32.
> 16384-band EQ... can you imagine the things you could do...
>
> David
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
> and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
> _______________________________________________
> Jamin-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jamin-devel

Hi David and Patrick,


I think we have all different ideas how this would look like. My idea 
was this:

Take the original Jamin without any significant changes. Behind the 
stereo outputs comes a new (second) crossover, that should be selectable 
in 2 to 8 bands. Personally 8 is too much, but I see people want it so 
let's make it 8. That means 8 x 2 outputs.
Between the output of that second crossover and real jack output there 
should be a level control, a 0 to 10 mSec delay and a hard limiter. That 
limiter would be synced between left/right on the same band but not 
linked with the other bands. The limiter should have a bypass and 
threshold. There is no compressor needed in the last stage, dynamics 
should be done at the beginning in the original Jamin part.
Ah, and a level meter on the output.

Should the whole thing be able to do 5 or 7 channels audio? Movie makers 
may want that.

The crossover frequencies in the original part with compressors that 
form the original Mastering thing should stay as it is. Maybe an option 
to make it more then three bands as we now have.

The crossover frequencies on the second (new) stage are defined by the 
speaker systems that the new stereo outputs are driving.

If you think about all this, it could be a pluggable design. The user 
designs what goes in the signal path and where.

I also see a lot of problems here in the UI design and remote control, 
but that should be solvable somehow.


gtx, Michiel.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb