Re: Feature Request JAMin
Michiel Broek <[email protected]> Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:38:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.jamin.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Patrick, On 02/06/2013 01:35 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > On Wed, February 6, 2013 8:12 pm, Michiel Broek wrote: >> On 02/06/2013 05:42 AM, David Nielson wrote: >>> On 02/05/2013 04:58 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote: >>>> On Wed, February 6, 2013 8:35 am, David Nielson wrote: >>>>> On 02/05/2013 02:32 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote: >>>>>> I'm thinking of the best way to handle that in the UI. We could add a >>>>>> "tabbed" view to each compressor to display the delay control, >>>>>> limiter >>>>>> and >>>>>> volume for each band by making the "delay" label clickable. Other >>>>>> suggestions welcome. >>>>> Sounds ideal to me. Though if you put them in tabs, you could make all >>>>> the controls available all the time, so long as the right tab is >>>>> selected. >>>>> >>>>> > I suppose it is just a case of adding additional sliders for each >>>>> > band and giving them their own compressor+delay+limiter+volume >>>>> > control? Do we need to have some kind of sane limit to the number >>>>> of >>>>> > bands in the xover? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I believe you're right. >>>>> >>>>> We've got two people suggesting 8... *I* can't imagine needing more >>>>> than >>>>> 8 bands, but I hate to be Bill Gates saying 640k ought to be enough >>>>> for >>>>> anybody ;-) >>>>> >>>> Just to confirm, by 8 band we are talking about 4 x stereo so we would >>>> have 4 compressors instead of three. >>> Hmm, I'm not sure what the other fellow meant, but I meant 8 compressors >>> for a grand total of 16 outputs under stereo operation. >>> >>>> Would we need more xover bands if we gave the option to increase the >>>> number of EQ bands from 1024 upto 16384? Looking at the code it should >>>> be >>>> fine to do that as long as the total is a power of 2 and more than 32. >>> 16384-band EQ... can you imagine the things you could do... >>> >>> David >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer >>> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 >>> and get the hardware for free! Learn more. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jamin-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jamin-devel >> Hi David and Patrick, >> >> >> I think we have all different ideas how this would look like. My idea >> was this: >> >> Take the original Jamin without any significant changes. Behind the >> stereo outputs comes a new (second) crossover, that should be selectable >> in 2 to 8 bands. Personally 8 is too much, but I see people want it so >> let's make it 8. That means 8 x 2 outputs. > Ok, I'm seeing the functionality now. Thanks for explaining so concisely. No problem. >> Between the output of that second crossover and real jack output there >> should be a level control, a 0 to 10 mSec delay and a hard limiter. That >> limiter would be synced between left/right on the same band but not >> linked with the other bands. The limiter should have a bypass and >> threshold. There is no compressor needed in the last stage, dynamics >> should be done at the beginning in the original Jamin part. >> Ah, and a level meter on the output. >> >> Should the whole thing be able to do 5 or 7 channels audio? Movie makers >> may want that. >> >> The crossover frequencies in the original part with compressors that >> form the original Mastering thing should stay as it is. Maybe an option >> to make it more then three bands as we now have. >> > So we are basically looking at a whole new lower panel for the "live" > system compared to the "classic" mode. > Yes it does. >> The crossover frequencies on the second (new) stage are defined by the >> speaker systems that the new stereo outputs are driving. >> >> If you think about all this, it could be a pluggable design. The user >> designs what goes in the signal path and where. >> >> I also see a lot of problems here in the UI design and remote control, >> but that should be solvable somehow. >> > It's not too bad actually. Just time and testing. From the backend > perspective we are pretty close already. > I guess that most modules are already written, it looks like just adding these parts. I hope this is also what Florian Kraxberger was looking for. gtx, Michiel. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb