Re: Correct check for lame info tag from versions before 3.95.1
Mike Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.mp3.lame |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Orgis wrote: > > So... I suppose "LAME3.95 " is from 3.95.0. How does the string from > > 3.95.1 look, exactly? Is it "LAME3.95r"? > > I did some testing and it seems like 3.95.1 writes the same > string as 3.95 . Looking through the version.c sources at <http://lame.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/lame/lame/libmp3lame/version.c?view=log>, I see the "r" wasn't introduced until 3.96.1. I incorporated this into my documentation of the version string madness at <http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=LAME#LAME_version_string_formatting>. If someone can better summarize this, maybe it could be included in the official LAME docs somewhere? Or maybe it's too estoeric? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2