Re: [mpc-devel] Re: Protocol of my 2+ hrs telephone conversation with Frank Klemm
Roberto José de Amorim <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:40:59 -0300 (ART)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel,gmane.comp.audio.mpc.devel,gmane.comp.audio.mpc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Christian HJ Wiesner <[email protected]> escreveu:=20 > Apart from the better hardware=20 > decoder support in existing DVD players and Surround receivers, i=20 > personally cant see any reason to not use AAC for a new encoder format. There is a rumour going around (and I stress this is only a rumour) that you can detect by reading the mpegif mailing lists, about Sony and Philips pushing AAC as the standard audio codec for Blu-Ray DVDs. It makes sense, if you consider Philips and Sony have licensing=20 interests in the AAC format, while AC3 is only of interest for Dolby. Besides, AAC is more efficient - you need about 300kbps to store a 5.1 stream with good quality, while AC3 is usually encoded at 448kbps for 5.1 - a 50% increase in size. Another hint of this tendency is the receiver Sony recently released that supports multichannel AAC LC decoding. It has been mentioned at=20 Hydrogenaudio: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?showtopic=3D10222& Anyway, just some rumours... Regards; Roberto.