Re: [mb-users] Are different digital downloads different releases?
Andrew Conkling <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALcbborZ=w5cx2RvqxxNZ6_8A9Dj291Bgv4gmWp5_obc0i+ToQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Agreed. At least for now though, this is a notable exception. :) Sounds like a remaster though, so that should pretty undisputedly fall as a separate release. On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]>wrote: > 2013/1/8 Andrew Conkling <[email protected]> > >> I think the idea is that the files can come in a variety of ways, but >> always from the same source material (a CD). That's probably analogous to >> digital downloads, but since people are getting them directly from a "mass" >> source, it's less clear what to do with any variety. >> > > Not always: from some like http://www.qobuz.com/ , you can download music > with a higher resolution than CDs, according to Qobuz, they are able to do > this by encoding from the studio rapes themselves. This kind of download at > least should be kept separated IMO. > > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria > (davitof) > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - > http://www.april.org > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users > _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users