Re: [mb-users] Are different digital downloads different releases?

It is a kind of remaster, or at least a different master, so it should. But
if we don't write this down, some editors might misunderstand this point.

2013/1/9 Andrew Conkling <[email protected]>

> Agreed. At least for now though, this is a notable exception. :) Sounds
> like a remaster though, so that should pretty undisputedly fall as a
> separate release.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  2013/1/8 Andrew Conkling <[email protected]>
>>
>>> I think the idea is that the files can come in a variety of ways, but
>>> always from the same source material (a CD). That's probably analogous to
>>> digital downloads, but since people are getting them directly from a "mass"
>>> source, it's less clear what to do with any variety.
>>>
>>
>> Not always: from some like http://www.qobuz.com/ , you can download
>> music with a higher resolution than CDs, according to Qobuz, they are able
>> to do this by encoding from the studio rapes themselves. This kind of
>> download at least should be kept separated IMO.
>>
>> --
>> Frederic Da Vitoria
>> (davitof)
>>
>> Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
>> http://www.april.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>



-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users