[mb-users] Sorting sub-works and more generally ARs
Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:37:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANe_y9TA0mfvFugZ9W_81sznz0pQLXwWESiH9nT_FnD_cb-3+w@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello, http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-3375 is more than 2 years old. It seems it is stuck because nobody is sure how it should be implemented. I feel many important things are clumsily patched (or not addressed at all) because we lack ordering. I'd like to revive the discussion about this and hopefully not have yet another schema change without it. Here is my suggestion: add a simple number to ARs which could be used by the AR types which we find relevant. This number would of course be used for ordering. Why not a string allowing for things like "2.1.5"? Because I am not currently convinced that smart sorting on strings such as this would be the correct way to handle sub-hierarchies. -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users