Re: [mb-users] Sorting sub-works and more generally ARs
"Lemire, Sebastien" <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:35:26 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEFzDVrHaq7Gv5fKqo4bTR1rk9-nd0oGDzexrxX4C0PXaV67ug@mail.gmail.com> |
Earlier we have news of attributes to works and now this. Looks like Christmas must have come early :) As for how to implement this, the simple way would be a numerical attribute in attribute for the Work is a part of work relationship. It might not gracefully handle one making a mistake and entering the same number to two the sub-works though... Also editing mistakes or adding a work in the middle would be a pain in the a**. The best solution would that as soon as a work has 2 or more parts related to it, that an option appears on the right hand-side to re-order the parts. Clicking on it would bring a small GUI and we could move them similarly to how he we currently move tracks on a tracklist. The actual ordering value could be kept internal to MB and not be editable by hand. As for sub-hierarchies, I'd be happy with having to treat each sub-hearchy separately. Although it would be nice obvously if you go to the top of the tree, click on the re-order and see the whole tree... Makes sense? Sebastien On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello, > > http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-3375 is more than 2 years old. > It seems it is stuck because nobody is sure how it should be implemented. I > feel many important things are clumsily patched (or not addressed at all) > because we lack ordering. I'd like to revive the discussion about this and > hopefully not have yet another schema change without it. > > Here is my suggestion: add a simple number to ARs which could be used by > the AR types which we find relevant. This number would of course be used > for ordering. > > Why not a string allowing for things like "2.1.5"? Because I am not > currently convinced that smart sorting on strings such as this would be the > correct way to handle sub-hierarchies. > > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria > (davitof) > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - > http://www.april.org > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users > _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users