Re: [mb-users] Balance engineer

Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jan 2014 23:14:43 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user
Message-ID <CAHSHD+Vk9B=P-ZLdRYfB=6bxh9OWcAbmr2xxKrMfuO0AfhytMw@mail.gmail.com>
Yeah, that passed an RFV 4 years ago at a weird point on the history of
style, and it never got implemented I don't think. I actually closed a 2010
ticket about it last week because nobody had mentioned it again since :D

If a few more people show interest, I'll get it added.
On 24 Jan 2014 22:48, "Frederic Da Vitoria" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Balance engineer is explained here
> http://musicbrainz.org//doc/Category:Engineer_Relationship_Class but I
> couldn't use it for an AR as it didn't appear in the list. It also appears
> here
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/History:Balance_Engineer_Relationship_Type ,
> which could mean that it is deprecated, but nowhere could I find an
> explanation of why it was deprecated nor of what we should do with balance
> engineers.
>
> --
> Frederic Da Vitoria
> (davitof)
>
> Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
> http://www.april.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users