Re: [mb-users] Balance engineer
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jan 2014 23:14:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHSHD+Vk9B=P-ZLdRYfB=6bxh9OWcAbmr2xxKrMfuO0AfhytMw@mail.gmail.com> |
Yeah, that passed an RFV 4 years ago at a weird point on the history of style, and it never got implemented I don't think. I actually closed a 2010 ticket about it last week because nobody had mentioned it again since :D If a few more people show interest, I'll get it added. On 24 Jan 2014 22:48, "Frederic Da Vitoria" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Balance engineer is explained here > http://musicbrainz.org//doc/Category:Engineer_Relationship_Class but I > couldn't use it for an AR as it didn't appear in the list. It also appears > here > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/History:Balance_Engineer_Relationship_Type , > which could mean that it is deprecated, but nowhere could I find an > explanation of why it was deprecated nor of what we should do with balance > engineers. > > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria > (davitof) > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - > http://www.april.org > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users > _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users