Re: [mb-users] Balance engineer

2014/1/24 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]>

> Yeah, that passed an RFV 4 years ago at a weird point on the history of
> style, and it never got implemented I don't think. I actually closed a 2010
> ticket about it last week because nobody had mentioned it again since :D
>
> If a few more people show interest, I'll get it added.
> On 24 Jan 2014 22:48, "Frederic Da Vitoria" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Balance engineer is explained here
>> http://musicbrainz.org//doc/Category:Engineer_Relationship_Class but I
>> couldn't use it for an AR as it didn't appear in the list. It also appears
>> here
>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/History:Balance_Engineer_Relationship_Type ,
>> which could mean that it is deprecated, but nowhere could I find an
>> explanation of why it was deprecated nor of what we should do with balance
>> engineers.
>>
>
I have no strong opinion about it (does it need a separate role or could it
be entered as a sound engineer or another close role?) But in any event, we
must manage to get a documentation consistent with what the UI allows :-)

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users