Re: [mb-users] Balance engineer

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]>wrote:

> 2014/1/24 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]>
>
>> Yeah, that passed an RFV 4 years ago at a weird point on the history of
>> style, and it never got implemented I don't think. I actually closed a 2010
>> ticket about it last week because nobody had mentioned it again since :D
>>
>> If a few more people show interest, I'll get it added.
>> On 24 Jan 2014 22:48, "Frederic Da Vitoria" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Balance engineer is explained here
>>> http://musicbrainz.org//doc/Category:Engineer_Relationship_Class but I
>>> couldn't use it for an AR as it didn't appear in the list. It also appears
>>> here
>>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/History:Balance_Engineer_Relationship_Type, which could mean that it is deprecated, but nowhere could I find an
>>> explanation of why it was deprecated nor of what we should do with balance
>>> engineers.
>>>
>>
> I have no strong opinion about it (does it need a separate role or could
> it be entered as a sound engineer or another close role?) But in any event,
> we must manage to get a documentation consistent with what the UI allows :-)
>

Probably. Since class pages were always unnecessary and we're moving the
relationship docs themselves to the server (after which they'll just be
thankfully removed) we never actually checked to see if they matched
reality, heh. I have absolutely no idea what a balance engineer does, so I
can't really suggest any specific type (and I'd have gone with just
"engineer" myself.

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users