Re: [mb-users] Balance engineer
Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:01:54 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANe_y9QDXhL6M=zVFTBQ0sVFkdSW1KmD2J9Ta1SKMOoxw6UaSg@mail.gmail.com> |
2014/1/25 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]>wrote: > >> 2014/1/24 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]> >> >>> Yeah, that passed an RFV 4 years ago at a weird point on the history of >>> style, and it never got implemented I don't think. I actually closed a 2010 >>> ticket about it last week because nobody had mentioned it again since :D >>> >>> If a few more people show interest, I'll get it added. >>> On 24 Jan 2014 22:48, "Frederic Da Vitoria" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Balance engineer is explained here >>>> http://musicbrainz.org//doc/Category:Engineer_Relationship_Class but I >>>> couldn't use it for an AR as it didn't appear in the list. It also appears >>>> here >>>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/History:Balance_Engineer_Relationship_Type, which could mean that it is deprecated, but nowhere could I find an >>>> explanation of why it was deprecated nor of what we should do with balance >>>> engineers. >>>> >>> >> I have no strong opinion about it (does it need a separate role or could >> it be entered as a sound engineer or another close role?) But in any event, >> we must manage to get a documentation consistent with what the UI allows :-) >> > > Probably. Since class pages were always unnecessary and we're moving the > relationship docs themselves to the server (after which they'll just be > thankfully removed) we never actually checked to see if they matched > reality, heh. I have absolutely no idea what a balance engineer does, so I > can't really suggest any specific type (and I'd have gone with just > "engineer" myself. > According to http://jimmyether.com/2011/11/08/record_production-natural_vs_alien/ and http://www2.grammy.com/PDFs/Recording_Academy/Producers_And_Engineers/Engineer_Definitions.pdf, balance engineer is the same as mix engineer. So I suggest - removing the Balance engineer from http://musicbrainz.org//doc/Category:Engineer_Relationship_Class - adding Balance engineer into https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Mix_Engineer_Relationship_Type . BTW, I'd like to remove references to mixing console, -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users