Re: Protocol documentation updated

On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:15:37PM +0100, Per Westermark wrote:
> Give the guy a break.

Sorry, I didn't mean to sound like it was bad, just unnecessary IMO.

> I don't mind 10 different implementations.

Agreed.  As someone else said, choice is good.  But then again, I'd rather
one working version rather than 10 not-so-good ones, although in this case
the code is the easy bit.

> The main thing is still to constantly unravel more information about the
> protocol, and to get some reasonable functionallity on a number of
> operating systems.

Agreed again.  And Marcus has certainly done a lot for this, which is
commendable.  And he's been quite happy to scan for commands while most of
us (me included) are too scared we'll stumble upon the 'self destruct'
command.  Again, commendable.

Pete
-- 
Pete Ryland
http://pdr.cx/