Re: Low timer resolution (but it shouldn't be!)
Jeronimo Pellegrini via Rosegarden-user <rosegarden-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> Fri, 07 Feb 2025 11:29:37 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.rosegarden.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2025-02-05 14:52, Ted Felix wrote: > On 1/31/25 6:18 AM, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: >> So... It was already set to "auto". Then, I changed to "system timer", >> restarted Rosegarden, and now it shows the timer as "OK" (Thanks for >> pointing me to the right place in the config). So perhaps the "auto" >> setting is not working as expected? > > Actually, it looks like the "system timer" setting does not perform > the resolution checks. Can you try the following on your system: > > $ grep ^CONFIG_HZ /boot/config-`uname -r` Oh, I see. You mean this: CONFIG_HZ_250=y CONFIG_HZ=250 It seems then that Debian ships a kernel patched for real-time, that operates at 250Hz (?) But shouldn't the "system timer" setting actually do check if the timer is good? J.