Re: [p2p-hackers] Re: [mnet-devel] desiderata and open issues in ent (fwd from [email protected])

On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 12:17:51PM -0700, Kevin McCoy wrote:
> Did you have to forward all those messages as attachments?  That's not a
> good thing to do if you actually want people to read them.

They're only attachments if you happen to run RFC-noncompliant MUAs such
as your Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158

But that's probably the least of your worries right now... 
I sure hope you're snorting the Windows update daily. I'm
doing it at work, for sure. Good for your system hygiene.

Sorry for the forward flurry; should have digested them, but don't
know how. I earlier mentioned that SF should be a good additive to
them cheap Linux NAT firewalls, if provided with a POTS jack
and DynDNS client/LDAP link, but that email apparently got
eaten somewhere along the way. Notice that NAT doesn't bite
if SF is running in your firewall. It should be also possible
to stick gpg for session key exchange, or actually bite the
bullet, and use IPsec (will need fat embeddeds, though).

That sure looks like a viable business plan to me, especially in
new rollouts in developing countries, and such.
 
> Kevin
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eugen Leitl" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 03:40
> Subject: [speak-freely] [p2p-hackers] Re: [mnet-devel] desiderata and open
> issues in ent (fwd from [email protected])
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                       * * *
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send E-mail containing
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body (*not* as the
> Subject) to [email protected]

                      * * *

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send E-mail containing
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body (*not* as the
Subject) to [email protected]