Re: Poll: Both ends behind NAT...

"Ed Kapitein" <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:47:38 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.speak-freely.general
Message-ID <20031122234739.26446.h005.c012.wm@mail.icqmail.com.criticalpath.net>
Hi All,

I am happy to see speakfreely working with the nat
traversal code.
There is one "flaw"" in this setup however.
Asume two people in a internet cafe to start
speakfreely.
Now the NAT router *MUST* change the port of one of the
inside hosts in order to deliver the return packets to
the corect inside host.
(now i come to think of it, if two people start SF
simultaniously, one might end up with 2 incomming
streams !)

Did anyone found a solution to this?
(as much nitty gritty technical details as possible
please... i love the technical details of SF)


> On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 10:05:34PM +0100, Johannes
> Poehlmann wrote:
> > There is no problem, as long you control the NAT
> router. 
> > 
><SNIP>< (to keep non posters hapy ;-)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Schrijf in voor ICQ en u ontvangt een gratis email adres op www.icq.com

                      * * *

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send E-mail containing
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body (*not* as the
Subject) to [email protected]