Re: Building a Racket client for SC
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN4YmREkUbONvRJjWdydNvE88oMWaSzcRwy3Gs5q9G1W=zRtcA@mail.gmail.com> |
Yes, but as I said, ugens such as SendReply will be classified as "sender" class of ugen, and those won't be wrapped by an Out.ar. Also, the ugengraph will be recursively recovered from such sender ugens (after having wrapped the last ugen, if not a sender). On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 18:32, <[email protected]> wrote: > >Perhaps it is worth noting that, in spite of the name, Synths don't > necessarily > >need to perform synthesis require and therefore might not require an Out > UGen > >(or similar). > > Oops! A stray "require" lingered in there... What I meant to say was: > > Synths don't necessarily need to perform synthesis and therefore might not > require > an Out UGen (or similar). > > ::: sam ::: > > _______________________________________________ > sc-users mailing list > > info (subscription, etc.): > http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx > archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/ > search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/ >