Re: Building a Racket client for SC
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN4YmRHYu4c3nF6hUY1+5jrXQbY3-VdhZOnuLVVQ8LB=HM4zUg@mail.gmail.com> |
oooops, that's me from a different account by the way. I thought I hadn't subscribed with this mail. On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 18:40, Dimaugh Silvestris <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but as I said, ugens such as SendReply will be classified as "sender" > class of ugen, and those won't be wrapped by an Out.ar. Also, the ugengraph > will be recursively recovered from such sender ugens (after having wrapped > the last ugen, if not a sender). > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 18:32, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >Perhaps it is worth noting that, in spite of the name, Synths don't >> necessarily >> >need to perform synthesis require and therefore might not require an Out >> UGen >> >(or similar). >> >> Oops! A stray "require" lingered in there... What I meant to say was: >> >> Synths don't necessarily need to perform synthesis and therefore might >> not require >> an Out UGen (or similar). >> >> ::: sam ::: >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sc-users mailing list >> >> info (subscription, etc.): >> http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx >> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/ >> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/ >> >