Re: Debian maintainership, using Arch
David Hough <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:36:58 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.zinf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:17:56 +0100, Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Kristian Kvilekval <[email protected]> writes: > ... > >>> To sum it up: it would be really nice to have bugfixes as clean >>> Arch changesets (see >>> http://regexps.srparish.net/tutorial-tla/exploring-changesets.html), >>> ideally including the Debian bug number they address in the log >>> message (see my log message for zinf--rotty--patch-3). >>> >>> I don't know if this is really workable without having all developers >>> switching to Arch, however. Yeah, this does sound like a good idea, perhaps cscvs or a similar tool could be useful for getting changesets from CVS history? >> Eventually I would like to move the archives back to sourceforge >> and possibly use tla-pqm http://web.verbum.org/arch-pqm/ >> If you feel like to trying to cobble it together, please give >> it a go. Currently it seem to have the required python and >> gpg so it might just work, but we would need tla running >> at least from a shell account. I played around for >> a bit, to see if I could just mirror up on there, but >> I got some errors and didn't check what caused them. >> >> > Well, I've set up tla-pqm at merkel.debian.org for > guile-gobject[0]. Unfortunatly, merkel.d.o has currently restricted > access due to a pending kernel update. Otherwise, and if tla-pqm > supports per-archive keyrings already, it would easily be possible to > host the patch queue for zinf there, too. Information access to the > queue would look like can be found in [1]. > > [0] http://www.gnu.org/software/guile-gtk/docs/guile-gobject/ > [1] > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-gtk-general/2004-02/msg00002.html > > Regards, Andy This does sound like it would be a great idea, does such a setup allow for changes in the CVS to be automatically synced with the arch archive and back again, or would it just be a central arch archive that someone would have to manually update with CVS? David -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click