Re: Win32 status
Tim Lesher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.zinf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 09:33:01AM -0800, Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote: > Currently the accepted practice is to use: > 1. full namespace naming in headers. > 2. using namespace is source files. OK. I have zero preference regarding "using" vs "std::", but I agree that "using" in the headers is bad. > How hard is the conversion process? Do you think we can build these > with mingw32? Fully manual, undocumented, and time-intensive. However, on the bright side it's compiler independent, and NSIS is command-line controllable (don't know about Inno), so we ought to be able to do "make wininstaller" or such when we get to that stage. -- Tim Lesher <[email protected]> http://www.lesher.ws ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en