Re: Re: Zinf 2.2.2?

Thanks for the info. I might be in a position to change that, since I am both a Win32 user and a Win32 developer.

I switched to zinf because the Emusic download manager doesn't work correctly, and and people at Emusic.com support just made
excuses and weird suggestions.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Sweetman" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [Zinf-users] Zinf 2.2.2?


> Stefan Bürbaum wrote:
> > Kristian G. Kvilekval schrieb am 05.02.03 um 18:47 Uhr:
> >
> >
> >
> >>zinf 2.2.2 and zinf 2.2.3 were unix only releases.   There is
> >>an effort beginning to resurrect the win32 branch, however for
> >>now the 2.2.1 is latest for win32 platforms.
> >
> >
> > Ähm, why is the win32 branch death?
> > I think there are anough with W32 platforms.
> > Please make a W32 build from aktual Betas.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
>
> go and read the archives of the devel branch.  There was a long call to
> win32 developers who wanted to fix win32 but none could.  So it was
> removed rather than continue being buggy and representative of zinf.
>
> Win32 users != win32 developers so just because people use it in win32
> doesn't help us any.
>
> Dont hold your breath for any modern win32 release anytime soon other
> than that based on 2.2.1
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Zinf-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zinf-users
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com