Re: The LinuxProblems page on the Autopackage wiki
"Isak Savo" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.autopackage.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2007/8/29, Damjan Jovanovic <[email protected]>: > > * The current practice is lockstep libraries, so at each point in time > (eg. 6 months) you take the latest version of every library out there > and compile them against each other to create a distribution. That's a > terrible thing to do, because backporting a package to an older > version of the distribution either means compiling it again against > the older libraries, or dragging dozens of new libraries into the > older version of the distribution when the user wants to install the > tiniest backported package. I honestly don't understand why no > distribution has pushed for binary compatibility to save themselves > from all this pain. Well, they practically make it a non-issue by (this is what Ubuntu does, but I guess they all do something similar): * Version locking all packages - only compatible security/bug fixes are available. * Let the world know: "this is CoolDistro vFOO - if you wanna build packages for it - these are the rules." * Only support a few versions of the distro at any give time. * Let any backporting be done by a "third party" project and as such, they aren't officially blessed. -Isak --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]