Re: The LinuxProblems page on the Autopackage wiki

"Isak Savo" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.autopackage.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
2007/8/29, Damjan Jovanovic <[email protected]>:
>
> * The current practice is lockstep libraries, so at each point in time
> (eg. 6 months) you take the latest version of every library out there
> and compile them against each other to create a distribution. That's a
> terrible thing to do, because backporting a package to an older
> version of the distribution either means compiling it again against
> the older libraries, or dragging dozens of new libraries into the
> older version of the distribution when the user wants to install the
> tiniest backported package. I honestly don't understand why no
> distribution has pushed for binary compatibility to save themselves
> from all this pain.

Well, they practically make it a non-issue by (this is what Ubuntu
does, but I guess they all do something similar):
 * Version locking all packages - only compatible security/bug fixes
are available.
 * Let the world know: "this is CoolDistro vFOO - if you wanna build
packages for it - these are the rules."
 * Only support a few versions of the distro at any give time.
 * Let any backporting be done by a "third party" project and as such,
they aren't officially blessed.

-Isak

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.