Re: Link gtkmm static

Okay maybe i should not do this. Why does it not work anyway?
Btw: Doesn't Inkscape also links gtkmm statically?

Jan-Nik

On Dec 1, 2007 7:41 PM, Isak Savo <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2007/12/1, Jan Niklas Hasse <[email protected]>:
> > I don't really need this. I'm writing a german tutorial for autopackage
> and
> > I wanted to use gtkmm as an example for statically linking and double
> > compilation. Is gtkmm the wrong library to do this?
>
> Depends on your purpose I guess. I don't *think* it needs to be
> statically linked, given how wide spread it is (and the fact that it
> is a system library), but if you are doing it for a tutorial style
> document, then why not..
>
> The problem is we don't want to send the wrong signals. If indeed
> gtkmm does NOT need static linking, then it's kind of weird to have a
> tutorial that explicitly statically links it. Better then to use
> something that actually is a problem (some available here:
> http://trac.autopackage.org/wiki/LibrariesToStaticallyLink, but there
> are most likely others,)
>
> -Isak
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
>
>