Re: Way of working or dangerous?
Jan Sielemann via Bacula-users <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Jan 2026 20:15:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bacula.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
yes, but the question was more, if the database-modification is a good way of working. I'm transporting the volume files via nightly sftp/rsync between the hosts, in rare cases with a physical disk. I just want to know, whether modifying the database in this way is recommendable or a strict no-go (and why). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 1/20/26 20:09, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 1/20/26 13:40, Dragan Milivojević wrote: >> If your internet is so bad that you can't use bacula copy jobs, use >> rsync to synchronize remote storage. > > This is an excellent suggestion. Seconded. rsync will transfer only > as much data as is needed to sync the files, and can resume an > interrupted copy. > > _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users