Re: New release Bacularis 6.2.0

--===============6482281472015593380==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001adb420652abaac9"

--0000000000001adb420652abaac9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I wonder if you could configure PHP to only be accessible from localhost,
or from a certain set of approved IPs.

Alternatively, you might be able to simply install bacularis on another
host altogether, and it would remotely connect to the relevant bacula
daemons.

Robert Gerber
402-237-8692
[email protected]

On Mon, May 25, 2026, 4:38=E2=80=AFPM Phil Stracchino <[email protected]=
> wrote:

> On 5/25/26 16:54, Rob Gerber wrote:
> > My opinion is that most people should choose bacularis.
>
> ...> For myself, I have used both, and overall prefer bacularis.
>
> Thank you, useful input.
>
> You touch actually on one of the major reasons I *don't* want to run a
> web management interface:  *I don't want PHP present on my web server.*
> I consider BAT much safer in this regard.
>
> So if I install *either* Baculum or Bacularis, I need to do it on a
> machine that does not have any public-facing interfaces.
>
>
> --
>    Phil Stracchino
>    Fenian House Publishing
>    [email protected]
>    [email protected]
>    Landline: +1.603.293.8485
>    Mobile:   +1.603.998.6958
>

--0000000000001adb420652abaac9
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><div>I wonder if you could configure PHP to only be acces=
sible from localhost, or from a certain set of approved IPs.</div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Alternatively, you might be able to s=
imply install bacularis on another host altogether, and it would remotely c=
onnect to the relevant bacula daemons.=C2=A0=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div=
 data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature">Robert Gerber<br>402-237-8692<br><a hre=
f=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a></div></div><br><div class=3D=
"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">O=
n Mon, May 25, 2026, 4:38=E2=80=AFPM Phil Stracchino &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:=
[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px=
 solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 5/25/26 16:54, Rob Gerber wrot=
e:<br>
&gt; My opinion is that most people should choose bacularis.<br>
<br>
...&gt; For myself, I have used both, and overall prefer bacularis.<br>
<br>
Thank you, useful input.<br>
<br>
You touch actually on one of the major reasons I *don&#39;t* want to run a =
<br>
web management interface:=C2=A0 *I don&#39;t want PHP present on my web ser=
ver.* <br>
I consider BAT much safer in this regard.<br>
<br>
So if I install *either* Baculum or Bacularis, I need to do it on a <br>
machine that does not have any public-facing interfaces.<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Phil Stracchino<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Fenian House Publishing<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" rel=
=3D"noreferrer">[email protected]</a><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" rel=
=3D"noreferrer">[email protected]</a><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Landline: +1.603.293.8485<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Mobile:=C2=A0 =C2=A0+1.603.998.6958<br>
</blockquote></div>

--0000000000001adb420652abaac9--


--===============6482281472015593380==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============6482281472015593380==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

--===============6482281472015593380==--