Re: Call to Benchmark PSGI!
Dylan Hardison <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:17:10 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.bugzilla.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANx7wf=33Qu+kRKuSGZwdn6OFJuHDCnd1Z39KXT=EVtia-QyMA@mail.gmail.com> |
I knew these numbers were too good to be true -- it turns out the stock mod_perl config has such a low Apache::SizeLimit that the process gets killed after a few requests. I've re-opened https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731589 and the new default will be a more more reasonable 250_000. I'm still keen on benchmarks, and I'll post my revised ones shortly. I recommend editing mod_perl.pl and setting the size limit to 250_000 or 750_000, or wait for Bug 731589 to land. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Dylan Hardison <[email protected]> wrote: > I think PSGI is *ridiculously* faster than mod_perl > > > Given a simple benchmark of calling apache bench against show_bug?id=1 > (with a simple testing db, mind you) I get 12 requests a second under PSGI > (using HTTP::Server::PSGI) and 4 requests/second with mod_perl > > So mod_perl is about twice as fast CGI, but PSGI is three times faster > than mod_perl. > > https://gist.github.com/dylanwh/d5c5498188c3866b7a03d > > So a call to people out there that have a working mod_perl setup --- > please benchmark > master on both mod_perl and PSGI and post the results here! > > Regards, > > Dylan. - To view or change your list settings, click here: <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers-Uylq5CNFT+jYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>