Re: Call to Benchmark PSGI!

We've been using 300_000 as the magic number for years now, and I find
bz performance to be quite acceptable. We do have three web heads though.

I can't wait to see your benchmark against psgi.

Denis



On 01/20/2016 12:17 AM, Dylan Hardison wrote:
> I knew these numbers were too good to be true -- it turns out the
> stock mod_perl config has such a low Apache::SizeLimit that the
> process gets killed after a few requests. I've re-opened
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731589 and the new
> default will be a more more reasonable 250_000.
> 
> I'm still keen on benchmarks, and I'll post my revised ones shortly. I
> recommend editing mod_perl.pl and setting the size limit to 250_000 or
> 750_000,
> or wait for Bug 731589 to land.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Dylan Hardison <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think PSGI is *ridiculously* faster than mod_perl
>>
>>
>> Given a simple benchmark of calling apache bench against show_bug?id=1
>> (with a simple testing db, mind you) I get 12 requests a second under PSGI
>> (using HTTP::Server::PSGI) and 4 requests/second with mod_perl
>>
>> So mod_perl is about twice as fast CGI, but PSGI is three times faster
>> than mod_perl.
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/dylanwh/d5c5498188c3866b7a03d
>>
>> So a call to people out there that have a working mod_perl setup ---
>> please benchmark
>> master on both mod_perl and PSGI and post the results here!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dylan.
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=denis.roy-j9T/[email protected]>
> 
-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers-Uylq5CNFT+jYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>