Re: mailgw argument parsing

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:49:32AM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:54:53PM -0500, John P. Rouillard wrote:
> 
> > and so on. (Yes, I know that -I is required, there is a bug about how
> > argparse help reports required args.)
> 
> What do you think about putting the argument of the current -I option
> into another file in the oauth directory. That way we remove the only
> required option (i.e. a non-optional option wich is a contradiction .-)

I've made that change. I'ts nicer to not have an 'option' that is
required. And it fits with all the other oauth things that need to be
present.

Ralf
-- 
Dr. Ralf Schlatterbeck                  Tel:   +43/2243/26465-16
Open Source Consulting                  www:   www.runtux.com
Reichergasse 131, A-3411 Weidling       email: [email protected]