Re: mailgw argument parsing

Hi Ralf:

In message <[email protected]>,
Ralf Schlatterbeck writes:
>On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:49:32AM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:54:53PM -0500, John P. Rouillard wrote:
>> 
>> > and so on. (Yes, I know that -I is required, there is a bug about how
>> > argparse help reports required args.)
>> 
>> What do you think about putting the argument of the current -I option
>> into another file in the oauth directory. That way we remove the only
>> required option (i.e. a non-optional option wich is a contradiction .-)
>
>I've made that change. I'ts nicer to not have an 'option' that is
>required. And it fits with all the other oauth things that need to be
>present.

Agreed.

Did you also update the man page in share/man/man1/roundup-mailgw.1 to
match.

Thanks for the update.


--
				-- rouilj
John Rouillard
===========================================================================
My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.