Re: NotImplementedError: Postgres FTS not available
Martin Östlund via Roundup-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/3/23 17:32, John P. Rouillard wrote: > Hi Martin: > > In message <[email protected]>, > =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_=c3=96stlund?= via Roundup-users writes: >> Following along, the Upgrade documentation for 2.2.0 to enable >> native-fts for Postgres at >> https://www.roundup-tracker.org/docs/upgrading.html#enhanced-full-text-search-optional >> >> Changing indexer to native-fts in config.ini (and running a supported >> PostgreSQL), reindexing my database throws an exception: > > I hope your upgrade to 2.2.0 wasn't to just use Postgres FTS. There > are a few fixes needed for Postgres FTS to work. They are in the > current development trunk. It turns out my test cases for 2.2.0's > PostgreSQL FTS were not testing what I thought they were. In fixing > that I found a few more issues. No, it wasn't :) I'm just trying to keep our tracker somewhat updated. I would rather not put us in the situation we were in 2 years ago, running Roundup 1.4.20 and having to migrate to 2.x ;) - Enable postgres-fts: fix indexer-common::get_indexer so it returns a > postgresql-fts. Test code paths in get_indexer. (John Rouillard) > - Fix Postgres native-fts, implement a two phase initialization of the > indexer. The native-fts one gets assigned after the database > connection is open. (John Rouillard) > - fix crash if postgresql native-fts backend is asked to index content > with null bytes. (John Rouillard) > > The one on top fixes: > >> line 150, in get_indexer >> raise NotImplementedError("Postgres FTS not available") >> NotImplementedError: Postgres FTS not available >> [roundup@intlab roundup-2.2.0]$ >> >> 149 if db.dbtype == "postgres": >> 150 raise NotImplementedError("Postgres FTS not available") >> 151 from roundup.backends.indexer_postgres_fts import Indexer >> 152 return Indexer(db) > >> Should it really raise an NotImplementedError here? > > Umm, no it shouldn't have. It should have raised a BuggyImplementation > exception 8-). That is more appropriate given the other bugs I found > 8-/. Sorry. > > If you really need Postgresql FTS, you can run the development > branch. There is no way to cherrypick the commits reliably. It would > be good to get somebody to test it in a real use case. Sadly nobody > tried it during the beta period. My "production" trackers run on > sqlite with whoosh so... > > After fixing the tests and things, I did spin up a tracker and tested > it manually against a local (14.x) postgres. It seemed to work. I was > able to get the proper issues returned (using web and tsquery type > searches) and the native search __words table was empty. It didn't get > a lot of testing with edge cases etc. trying to break it. > > I also just realized that the Errata page > (https://wiki.roundup-tracker.org/ReleaseErrata) isn't updated for > this. I'll fix that. > > Sorry I don't have better news. Have a great weekend. No problem at all. Keep up the good work! Regards, -- Martin Östlund Support Cendio AB https://cendio.com Teknikringen 8 https://twitter.com/ThinLinc 583 30 Linköping https://facebook.com/ThinLinc _______________________________________________ Roundup-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roundup-users