Re: Google Docs as capabilities as data

Domenico Rotondi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.capabilities.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 29 Jan 2014 at 15:35, Bill Frantz wrote:
Hi Bill,
I agree the SPKI has similarities with our system (indeed we were aware of it and we 
mention it in our papers).
We too have expiration time in a capability token. The revocation mechanism has 
been designed to manage situation in which you need to revoke 1+ token(s) before 
their expiration date (e.g., the maintenance team manager in company X has 
compromised is private X509 key; so there is the need to revoke all capability tokens 
he/she has created to avoid fake tokens).

Ciao
   Domenico

> On 1/29/14 at 1:15 AM, [email protected] (Domenico Rotondi) wrote:
> 
> > The generated tokens can be distributed to their owners using any means (even via a
> > public FPT service, being each token digitally signed and boud to a specific identity).
> > Each owner of a capability token can further frealy create additional tokens for other
> > subjects he/she trust granting a subset of the rights he/she owns (of course if his/her
> > token grants him/her the right to delegate).
> 
> Some of this description sounds like SPKI:
> 
>   SPKI Certificate Theory - RFC 2693
>   SPKI Requirements       - RFC 2692
> 
> SPKI did revocation through the expiration of the certificate.
> 
> Cheers - Bill
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Frantz        | There are now so many exceptions to the
> 408-356-8506       | Fourth Amendment that it operates only by
> www.pwpconsult.com | accident.  -  William Hugh Murray
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.